The puzzle of free indirect discourse

Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3):353-395 (2008)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to shed some light on the familiar puzzle of free indirect discourse (FID). FID shares some properties with standard indirect discourse and with direct discourse, but there is currently no known theory that can accommodate such a hybrid. Based on the observation that FID has ‘de se’ pronouns, I argue that it is a kind of an attitude report
Keywords Free indirect discourse  Discourse  Tense
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,768
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Andreas Stokke (2013). Protagonist Projection. Mind and Language 28 (2):204-232.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

42 ( #39,401 of 1,098,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #33,712 of 1,098,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.