The Problematic Representations of Visuality, Dream, and Time in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
[[abstract]]Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream has brought several vital issues into the fore, such as the function of dream, the idea of representation and the establishment of epistemology. These issues have been raised because they were closely related to the essential texture of Western culture, in which an epistemology based on visuality has constituted the most part of it. A visuality-oriented epistemology had worked its effects upon numerous literary works, drama performances in particular, which emphasize the importance of “look” and the idea of representation. To make these points clearer, this paper makes use of Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex as a point of departure for Western culture to show how the tradition it had made was challenged by A Midsummer Night’s Dream in terms of dream, representation and epistemology. By this exploration, this paper aims to highlight that a close and repeated reading of Shakespeare’s plays would bring out different observations, and this alternative reading is a solid illustration that a great work of art is immortal in that it keeps inviting possible interpretations as time goes by, and its complexity and diversity are all the more obvious.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vincent Francavilla (2009). The Masks of Comedy and Shakespeare's a Midsummer Night's Dream. In Leslie Anne Boldt-Irons, Corrado Federici & Ernesto Virgulti (eds.), Disguise, Deception, Trompe-L'oeil: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Peter Lang.
William M. Hawley (2010). A Midsummer Night's Dream : Relating Ethics to Mutuality. The European Legacy 15 (2):159-169.
D. J. Snider (1874). Midsummer Night's Dream. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 8 (2):165 - 186.
R. Wolman & M. KozMova (2007). Last Night I Had the Strangest Dream: Varieties of Rational Thought Processes in Dream Reports. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (4):838-849.
Roger Squires (1995). Dream Time. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:83-91.
James A. Knapp (2011). Image Ethics in Shakespeare and Spenser. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jean Hering (1947). Concerning Image, Idea, and Dream (Translation). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (December):188-205.
Richard A. Hilbert (2010). The Anomalous Foundations of Dream Telling: Objective Solipsism and the Problem of Meaning. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (1):41-64.
Tyrus Miller (1996). From City-Dreams to the Dreaming Collective: Walter Benjamin's Political Dream Interpretation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):87-111.
Mary Sirridge (2005). Dream Bodies and Dream Pains in Augustine's "de Natura Et Origine Animae". Vivarium 43 (2):213-249.
G. William Domhoff (2000). Needed: A New Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):928-930.
M. Schredl, A. T. Funkhouser, C. M. Cornu, Hirsbrunner H.-P. & M. Bahro (2001). Reliability in Dream Research: A Methodological Note. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):496-502.
Linda Mealey (2000). The Illusory Function of Dreams: Another Example of Cognitive Bias. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):971-972.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-10
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?