British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (4):415-418 (2002)
|Abstract||I shall describe yet another problem about fiction, similar in some respects to the ‘paradoxes of fiction’ on which so much ink has been spilt over the last quarter of a century. Since fictions are ‘made up’, what considerations stop us from making up our own endings to a fiction which is incomplete or whose ending we have lost or missed or whose ending is unpalatable?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ioannis Votsis, The Scope of Fiction: Comments on Tim Button's 'Where Fiction Ends and Reality Begins' 'Where Fiction Ends and Reality Begins'.
Robin le Poidevin (2001). Fate, Fiction and the Future. Philosophical Papers 30 (1):69-92.
Amy Yang (2010). Psychoanalysis and Detective Fiction: A Tale of Freud and Criminal Storytelling. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4).
C. L. Hardin (1991). Reply to Teller's Simpler Arguments Might Work Better. Philosophical Psychology 4:61-64.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Sutrop on Literary Fiction-Making: Defending Currie. Disputatio (28):151-157.
Jukka Mikkonen (2008). Philosophical Fiction and the Act of Fiction-Making. SATS 9 (2):116-132.
Frederick M. Keener (1983). The Chain of Becoming: The Philosophical Tale, the Novel, and a Neglected Realism of the Enlightenment: Swift, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Johnson, and Austen. Columbia University Press.
Peter Eldridge-Smith (2007). Paradoxes and Hypodoxes of Time Travel. In Jan Lloyd Jones, Paul Campbell & Peter Wylie (eds.), Art and Time. Australian Scholarly Publishing.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #133,381 of 549,010 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,010 )
How can I increase my downloads?