Universal sentences: Russell, Wittgenstein, prior, and the nyāya
Journal of Indian Philosophy 19 (2):103-119 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKisor Kumar Chakrabarti (2010). Classical Indian Philosophy of Induction: The Nyaya Viewpoint. Lexington Books.
Campbell Brown (forthcoming). Minding the Is-Ought Gap. Journal of Philosophical Logic.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1999). Null Sentences. Iyyun, The Jewish Philosophical Quarterly 48:23-36.
Colin Johnston (2009). Tractarian Objects and Logical Categories. Synthese 167 (1):145 - 161.
S. Friederich (2011). Motivating Wittgenstein's Perspective on Mathematical Sentences as Norms. Philosophia Mathematica 19 (1):1-19.
Kevin C. Klement (2004). Putting Form Before Function: Logical Grammar in Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. Philosophers' Imprint 4 (2):1-47.
Gregory Landini (2007). Wittgenstein's Apprenticeship with Russell. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #87,816 of 548,983 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,983 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
