David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (2):297-312 (1995)
The notion of rationality underlying contemporary business and business ethics, or the “rational actor” model of moral decision-making in business, links a roughly utilitarian notion of the good to a contractarian notion of human agency. The “C-Umodel” provides inadequate means for explaining how business people do or ought to behave or think about their behavior, because the notion of rationality upon which it relies is far too narrow a picture of business people’s character. An alternative to these assumptions and to the Contractarian-Utilitarian model, is offered in an ethics of virtue. Despite the traditional apparent conflict between these divergent models, the C-U model, if founded in a notion of rationality consistent with Aristotelian ethics, is recognized as a useful instrument in business ethics and business decision-making. Hence, a reconciliation is effected between the C-U model and virtue ethics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kevin Morrell (2004). Decision Making and Business Ethics: The Implications of Using Image Theory in Preference to Rational Choice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 50 (3):239-252.
Gjalt de Graaf (2006). The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):347-361.
Gjalt De Graaf (2006). The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):347 - 361.
Daryl Koehn (1998). Virtue Ethics, the Firm, and Moral Psychology. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):497-513.
Daryl Koehn (1995). A Role for Virtue Ethics in the Analysis of Business Practice. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):533-539.
Kirsten Martin & Bidhan Parmar (2012). Assumptions in Decision Making Scholarship: Implications for Business Ethics Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 105 (3):289-306.
Alexander Bertland (2009). Virtue Ethics in Business and the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):25 - 32.
Stephen Maguire (1997). Business Ethics: A Compromise Between Politics and Virtue. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1411-1418.
John R. Boatright (1999). Does Business Ethics Rest on a Mistake? Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (4):583-591.
Cam Caldwell, Stephen E. Clapham & Brian Davis (2007). Rights, Responsibilities, and Respect: A Balanced Citizenship Model for Schools of Business. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (1):105-120.
Steven M. Mintz (1996). Aristotelian Virtue and Business Ethics Education. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (8):827 - 838.
Eric H. Beversluis (1987). Is There “No Such Thing as Business Ethics”? Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):81 - 88.
Joanna G. Patsioti (2007). The Relevance of an Aretaic Model in Business Ethics. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:175-180.
Kevin T. Jackson (2005). Towards Authenticity: A Sartrean Perspective on Business Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 58 (4):307 - 325.
Patrick Primeaux & John Stieber (1994). Profit Maximization: The Ethical Mandate of Business. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):287 - 294.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #207,204 of 1,102,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?