What Can the Theory of Knowledge Learn from the History of Knowledge?
The Monist 60 (4):488-508 (1977)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHenry Plotkin (2007). Necessary Knowledge. OUP Oxford.
Russell Hardin (2003). If It Rained Knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (1):3-24.
Stephen Hetherington (2001). Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
John Hyman (2006). Knowledge and Evidence. Mind 115 (460):891-916.
Lydia Schumacher (2011). Divine Illumination: The History and Future of Augustine's Theory of Knowledge. Wiley-Blackwell.
Refeng Tang (2011). Knowing That, Knowing How, and Knowing to Do. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):426-442.
Velūri Subbārāvu (1998). Theories of Knowledge: Its Validity and its Sources. Sri Satguru Publications.
Huiming Ren (2012). The Distinction Between Knowledge-That and Knowledge-How. Philosophia 40 (4):857-875.
Huiming Ren (2012). The Knowledge Intuition and the Ability Hypothesis. Dialogue 51 (2):313-326.
Anne Newstead (2006). Knowledge by Intention? On the Possibility of Agent's Knowledge. In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Aspects of Knowing.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads4 ( #178,434 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
