What's really wrong with the argument from design?
| Abstract | This document is an edited transcript of an impromptu talk by Mark F. Sharlow. In this talk, Dr. Sharlow examines one of the common arguments for God’s existence. He suggests that this argument is wrong, but not for the reason that skeptics usually cite. Instead, he points out a deeper error — and shows that by understanding this mistake, we can gain new insights into evolution and design. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
 Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesElliott Sober (2004). The Design Argument. In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub..
Neil A. Manson (2000). Anthropocentrism and the Design Argument. Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.
Ira M. Schnall (2009). Anthropic Observation Selection Effects and the Design Argument. Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):361-377.
R. G. Swinburne (1968). The Argument From Design. Philosophy 43 (165):199 - 212.
Gregory W. Dawes (2007). What is Wrong with Intelligent Design? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.
Graham Oppy (2002). Paley's Argument for Design. Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-21Total downloads73 ( #11,372 of 549,011 )Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #3,271 of 549,011 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
