Ambition Versus Conscience, Does Corporate Social Responsibility Pay off? The Application of Matching Methods
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):133 - 153 (2009)
In this article, we examine the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firms' financial performance (CSR-effect). Two competing hypotheses, social impact hypothesis and shift of focus hypothesis, are proposed to investigate this issue, where the former suggests that CSR has a positive relation with performance and the latter are opposite. In order to ensure the CSR-effect is not contaminated by other faeton or samples are randomly drawn, we employ four matching methods, Nearest, Caliper, Mahala and Mahala Caliper to match the samples of CSR (CSR-firms) and without CSR (NonCSR-firms) with similar characteristics. Although four methods yield slightly different results, firms engaging in CSR activities tend to obtain significantly higher values on pretax income to net sales and profit margin, and adopting CSR at the very least not deteriorate the performance of firms, making our con clusion favors the social impact hypothesis and against shift of focus hypothesis in Taiwan. Thus, ambition and conscience are not conflicting with each other
|Keywords||corporate social responsibility selection bias matching method|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wenjing Li & Ran Zhang (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence From China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (4):631 - 645.
Chi-Shiun Lai, Chih-Jen Chiu, Chin-Fang Yang & Da-Chang Pai (2010). The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Performance: The Mediating Effect of Industrial Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):457 - 469.
Junwei Shi, Haiyan Fu & Lijun Hu (2007). Social Responsibility, Social Capital, and Corporate Competitive Advantage in Transitional China. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:377-394.
Amir Barnea & Amir Rubin (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1):71 - 86.
Yan Leung Cheung, Weiqiang Tan, Hee-Joon Ahn & Zheng Zhang (2010). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in Asian Emerging Markets? Journal of Business Ethics 92 (3):401 - 413.
Liangrong Zu & Lina Song (2009). Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):105 - 117.
Belaid Rettab, Anis Ben Brik & Kamel Mellahi (2009). A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):371 - 390.
Kangtao Ye & Ran Zhang (2011). Do Lenders Value Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence From China. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):197-206.
Roy W. Smolens & Nicolaas Tempelhof (2005). Cultural Perspectives of CSR Opportunities for German Firms in Poland. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:259-283.
Hoje Jo & Maretno A. Harjoto (2012). The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):53-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #126,840 of 1,013,596 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,884 of 1,013,596 )
How can I increase my downloads?