Aristotle's View on "The Right of Practice": An Investigation into Aristotle's Theory of Action
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):251 - 263 (2009)
| Abstract | The concept of right or fit is an important element entailed, but not fully articulated, in the concept of action or practice in Aristotle's theory of virtue; which, however, turns to be of the utmost importance in later Western ethics. Right is concerned with both feelings and actions, and is not the same for all individuals. It lies in between the two extremes of the spectrum of practical affairs, yet by no means equidistant from them. This account of the concept of fitness or right is derived from the categories of quantity, relationship, and quality rather than from that of substance. Thus, it seems that virtue is relative to vice or error within a continuous existence. If, however, the right of passion and action is environmental and concrete, is it multiple and not singular? To this question, Aristotle gives his reply on two levels: On the level of concrete practitioners, what is right and fit to one man might not be so to another man, and hence the right of practice is not singular but multiple; whereas on the level concerned with the only right choice compared with the two extremes or errors, the right of practice will always be singular. /// "正确"是隐含于亚里士多德的德性学说中的一个重要而未充分展开的,在 后来的西方伦理学中却变成极为重要的关于行为或实践的概念。"正确"与感情和 行为都相关。"正确"并不是对所有人同样的。它是两端间的那个中间,但井不始 终与两端距离相等。对适度或正确的这种说明基本上是从数量、关系与性质范畴引 出,而不是从实体范畴引出的述说。所以,德性似乎始终是在一种有连续性的存在 中相对于恶或错误而言的。感情与行为的正确如果是环境的、具体的,它是否是多 而不是一?亚里士多德在两个层面上回答这个问题。在相对于具体实践者的层面, 对我而言的适度或正确很可能不同于对你而言的,实践的正确不是一而是多:在相 对于两端或错误唯有一个正确的选择而言,实践的正确始终只是一。. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Shenbai Liao (2009). Aristotle's View on “the Right of Practice”: An Investigation Into Aristotle's Theory of Action. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):251-263.
Walter A. Brogan (2002). Gadamer's Praise of Theory: Aristotle's Friend and the Reciprocity Between Theory and Practice. Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):141-155.
Piotr Makowski (2009). Metaphysics of Practical Philosophy. The Concept of Capacity in Aristotle. In Georg Arabatzis (ed.), Studies on Supernaturalism. Logos Verlag.
Alfred R. Mele (1981). Choice and Virtue in the Nicomachean Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (4):405-423.
Klaas Tindemans (forthcoming). The Politics of the Poetics: Aristotle and Drama Theory in 17th Century France. Foundations of Science.
Sherwin Klein (1998). An Aristotelian View of Theory and Practice in Business Ethics. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):203-222.
Shenbai Liao (2011). The Subjectivity and Universality of Virtues—An Investigation Based on Confucius' and Aristotle's Views. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):217-238.
Piotr Makowski (2012). Dynamis. Metafizyczne pojęcie możności i jego rola w filozofii praktycznej Arystotelesa. Diametros 33:76-100.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1967). Aristotle. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1968). Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays. Melbourne, Macmillan.
Jennifer Whiting (2002). Eudaimonia, External Results, and Choosing Virtuous Actions for Themselves. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):270-290.
Sherman (2006). Wisdom and Action Guidance in the Agent-Based Virtue Ethics of Aristotle. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):481-506.
S. J. Thomas Sherman (2006). Wisdom and Action Guidance in the Agent-Based Virtue Ethics of Aristotle. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):481-506.
Aristotle (2002). Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals. Clarendon Press.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

