Formal Logic for Informal Logicians

Informal Logic 26 (2):199-220 (2006)
Abstract
Classical logic yields counterintuitive results for numerous propositional argument forms. The usual alternatives (modal logic, relevance logic, etc.) generate counterintuitive results of their own. The counterintuitive results create problems—especially pedagogical problems—for informal logicians who wish to use formal logic to analyze ordinary argumentation. This paper presents a system, PL– (propositional logic minus the funny business), based on the idea that paradigmatic valid argument forms arise from justificatory or explanatory discourse. PL– avoids the pedagogical difficulties without sacrificing insight into argument.
Keywords discursive practice, propositional logic, paradoxes of material implication
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,456
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Aberdein (2010). Virtue in Argument. Argumentation 24 (2):165-179.
Similar books and articles
Robert Baum (1975). Logic. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-26

Total downloads

37 ( #47,765 of 1,102,450 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #30,059 of 1,102,450 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.