Hypatia 12 (2):1 - 50 (1997)
|Abstract||In this essay, I attempt to outline a feminist philosophical approach to the current debate concerning (allegedly) false memories of childhood sexual abuse. Bringing the voices of feminist philosophers to bear on this issue highlights the implicit and sometimes questionable epistemological, metaphysical, and ethical-political commitments of some therapists and scientists involved in these debates. It also illuminates some current debates in and about feminist philosophy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Leslie J. Miller & Jana Metcalfe (1998). Strategically Speaking: The Problem of Essentializing Terms in Feminist Theory and Feminist Organizational Talk. Human Studies 21 (3):235-257.
Nathan Nobis (2005). Feminist Ethics Without Feminist Ethical Theory (Or, More Generally, “Φ Ethics Without Φ Ethical Theory”). Journal of Philosophical Research 30:213-225.
E. J. Lowe (1998). Commentary on False Memory Syndrome and the Authority of Personal Memory-Claims. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 5 (4):309-310.
Janice McLaughlin (2003). Feminist Social and Political Theory: Contemporary Debates and Dialogues. Palgrave Macmillan.
Valerie Bryson (2003). Feminist Political Theory: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jeffrey Prager (1998). Presenting the Past: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Misremembering. Harvard University Press.
Margaret Olivia Little (1996). Why a Feminist Approach to Bioethics? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (1):1-18.
Ross E. Cheit (1998). Consider This, Skeptics of Recovered Memory. Ethics and Behavior 8 (2):141 – 160.
Andy Hamilton (1998). False Memory Syndrome and the Authority of Personal Memory-Claims: A Philosophical Perspective. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 5 (4):283-297.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads3 ( #203,804 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?