David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89 (2004)
George Dickie argues that Hume's principles of taste have value-laden properties as their subjects, including those properties we now refer to as ‘aesthetic’. I counter that Hume's principles have value-neutral properties as their subjects, and so exclude those properties we now refer to as ‘aesthetic’. Dickie also argues that Hume's essay on taste provides ‘the conceptual means for recognizing the problem of the interaction of aesthetic properties with other properties of artworks’. I counter that the very passages Dickie takes to provide these conceptual means in fact suggest that Hume recognizes no such problem.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar (2005). Irreversible Generalism: A Reply to Dickie. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):289-295.
George Dickie (1996). The Century of Taste: The Philosophical Odyssey of Taste in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford University Press.
James Shelley (2002). The Character and Role of Principles in the Evaluation of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51.
Theodore Gracyk (2011). Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Christopher Perricone (2011). What Women Want: (Among Other Things) Quality Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (3):88-102.
George Dickie (1989). Kant, Mothersill and Principles of Taste. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):375-376.
Elisabeth Schellekens (2009). Taste and Objectivity: The Emergence of the Concept of the Aesthetic. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743.
George Dickie (1973). Taste and Attitude: The Origin of the Aesthetic. Theoria 39 (1-3):153-170.
Brian Ribeiro (2007). Hume's Standard of Taste and the de Gustibus Sceptic. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):16-28.
George Dickie (2003). James Shelley on Critical Principles. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):57-64.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #49,978 of 1,139,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #96,101 of 1,139,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?