Obligation as self-determination: A critique of Hegel and Korsgaard
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2):155–174 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKristin Gjesdal (2009). Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Eric Wiland (2000). A Fallacy in Korsgaard's Argument for Moral Obligation. Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (1):103-104.
Jaspm S. Baehr (2003). Korsgaard on the Foundations of Moral Obligation. Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (4):481-491.
Saul Tobias (2006). Hegel and the Politics of Recognition. Owl of Minerva 38 (1/2):101-126.
Robert R. Williams (2006). Hegel's Critique of Kant. Owl of Minerva 38 (1/2):9-34.
David Kolb (1986). The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After. University of Chicago Press.
David A. Duquette (1988). From Disciple to Antagonist. Philosophy and Theology 3 (2):183-199.
Bryan Lueck (2009). Kant's Fact of Reason as Source of Normativity. Inquiry 52 (6):596 – 608.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #147,054 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
