David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):581-601 (2001)
The universality, invariance, and elegance of principles governing the universe may be reflected in principles of the minds that have evolved in that universe – provided that the mental principles are formulated with respect to the abstract spaces appropriate for the representation of biologically significant objects and their properties. (1) Positions and motions of objects conserve their shapes in the geometrically fullest and simplest way when represented as points and connecting geodesic paths in the six-dimensional manifold jointly determined by the Euclidean group of three-dimensional space and the symmetry group of each object. (2) Colors of objects attain constancy when represented as points in a three-dimensional vector space in which each variation in natural illumination is canceled by application of its inverse from the three-dimensional linear group of terrestrial transformations of the invariant solar source. (3) Kinds of objects support optimal generalization and categorization when represented, in an evolutionarily-shaped space of possible objects, as connected regions with associated weights determined by Bayesian revision of maximum-entropy priors. Key Words: apparent motion; Bayesian inference; cognition; color constancy; generalization; mental rotation; perception; psychological laws; psychological space; universal laws.
|Keywords||apparent motion Bayesian inference cognition color constancy generalization mental rotation perception psychological laws psychological space universal laws|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Terry Regier & Paul Kay (2009). Language, Thought, and Color: Whorf Was Half Right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (10):439-446.
Daniel L. Schwartz & John B. Black (1996). Shuttling Between Depictive Models and Abstract Rules: Induction and Fallback. Cognitive Science 20 (4):457-497.
Stanislas Dehaene & Elizabeth M. Brannon (2010). Space, Time, and Number: A Kantian Research Program. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (12):517-519.
Igor Douven & Lieven Decock (2010). Identity and Similarity. Philosophical Studies 151 (1):59-78.
Jacob Feldman (2013). Tuning Your Priors to the World. Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):13-34.
Similar books and articles
Peter Bradley (2008). Constancy, Categories and Bayes: A New Approach to Representational Theories of Color Constancy. Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):601 – 627.
J. R. Lucas (1969). Euclides Ab Omni Naevo Vindicatus. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-11.
Jeffrey Sanford Russell (2008). The Structure of Gunk: Adventures in the Ontology of Space. In Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 4. Oxford University Press 248.
John Hawthorne & Theodore Sider (2002). Locations. Philosophical Topics 30 (1):53-76.
Giorgio Parisi (2003). Two Spaces Looking for a Geometer. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):181-196.
Gary C. Hatfield (2009). Perception and Cognition: Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Bradley Monton (2002). Wave Function Ontology. Synthese 130 (2):265 - 277.
Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Thomas L. Griffiths (2001). Generalization, Similarity, and Bayesian Inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629-640.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #102,198 of 1,846,881 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #39,776 of 1,846,881 )
How can I increase my downloads?