Graduate studies at Western
British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51 (2002)
|Abstract||, George Dickie offers an account of artistic principles comprising both a description of their character and a description of the role they play in the evaluation of artworks. According to the former, artistic principles state that certain individual properties of artworks, in isolation from other properties, are always artistic merits; according to the latter, artistic principles serve as premises from which we infer that artworks have artistic merit. I argue not merely that Dickie 's account fails, but that any account comprising either component of Dickie's account fails. Because not every account of artistic principles need comprise either of Dickie's components, the success of my argument will not rule out every possible account. But it will rule out many, and it will place tight constraints on the rest—tight enough, I believe, to raise worries about whether principles play any role in the evaluation of art.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Crowther (2007). Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt. Oxford University Press.
George Dickie (2003). James Shelley on Critical Principles. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):57-64.
James Shelley (2004). Hume's Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
Henry John Pratt (2012). Artistic Institutions, Valuable Experiences: Coming to Terms with Artistic Value. Philosophia 40 (3):591-606.
Roman Dykast (2010). Otakar Zich: Aesthetic and Artistic Evaluation, Parts 2 & 3. Estetika 47 (1):71-95.
John Dilworth (2004). Artistic Expression as Interpretation. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):162-174.
Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar (2005). Irreversible Generalism: A Reply to Dickie. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):289-295.
Robert Hopkins (2007). Speaking Through Silence : Conceptual Art and Conversational Implicature. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press.
Kathleen Stock (2005). On Davies' Argument From Relational Properties. Acta Analytica 20 (4):24-31.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,281 of 739,345 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,345 )
How can I increase my downloads?