The problem of non-perceptual art

British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):363-378 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consider the following three propositions: (R) Artworks necessarily have aesthetic properties that are relevant to their appreciation as artworks. (S) Aesthetic properties necessarily depend, at least in part, on properties perceived by means of the five senses. (X) There exist artworks that need not be perceived by means of the five senses to be appreciated as artworks. The independent plausibility and apparent joint inconsistency of these three propositions give rise to what I refer to as ‘the problem of non-perceptual art’. Assuming that the propositions are independently plausible and jointly inconsistent, there will be three ways of solving the problem: you may affirm (R) and (S) while denying (X); you may affirm (S) and (X) while denying (R); or you may affirm (R) and (X) while denying (S). The first of these, once the orthodox solution, has been displaced in recent years by the second. The third has never really been defended. I defend it here. If successful, my defence will have shown that there is reason to deny the existence of non-aesthetic art and no reason to believe that art is not essentially aesthetic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics.John Dilworth - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353.
Imagining art.Brandon Cooke - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):29-45.
Speaking through silence : conceptual art and conversational implicature.Robert Hopkins - 2007 - In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press.
Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
The artistic and the aesthetic.Graham McFee - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (4):368-387.
James Shelley on critical principles.George Dickie - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):57-64.
Aesthetic value.Alan H. Goldman - 1995 - Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Non-perceptual aesthetic properties: Comments for James Shelley.Noël Carroll - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):413-423.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
260 (#70,383)

6 months
21 (#100,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Shelley
Auburn University

Citations of this work

On Liking Aesthetic Value.Keren Gorodeisky - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (2):261-280.
The Value of Consciousness.Uriah Kriegel - 2019 - Analysis 79 (3):503-520.
Inference as Consciousness of Necessity.Eric Marcus - 2020 - Analytic Philosophy 61 (4):304-322.
Aesthetic knowledge.Keren Gorodeisky & Eric Marcus - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2507-2535.
The concept of the aesthetic.James Shelley - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references