David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):363-378 (2003)
Consider the following three propositions: (R) Artworks necessarily have aesthetic properties that are relevant to their appreciation as artworks. (S) Aesthetic properties necessarily depend, at least in part, on properties perceived by means of the five senses. (X) There exist artworks that need not be perceived by means of the five senses to be appreciated as artworks. The independent plausibility and apparent joint inconsistency of these three propositions give rise to what I refer to as ‘the problem of non-perceptual art’. Assuming that the propositions are independently plausible and jointly inconsistent, there will be three ways of solving the problem: you may affirm (R) and (S) while denying (X); you may affirm (S) and (X) while denying (R); or you may affirm (R) and (X) while denying (S). The first of these, once the orthodox solution, has been displaced in recent years by the second. The third has never really been defended. I defend it here. If successful, my defence will have shown that there is reason to deny the existence of non-aesthetic art and no reason to believe that art is not essentially aesthetic.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Watkins & James Shelley (2012). Response-Dependence About Aesthetic Value. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):338-352.
James Shelley (2010). Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):707-720.
Jon Robson (2014). Aesthetic Autonomy and Self-Aggrandisement. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 75:3-28.
Similar books and articles
John Dilworth (2008). The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353.
Alan H. Goldman (1995). Aesthetic Value. Westview Press.
George Dickie (2003). James Shelley on Critical Principles. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):57-64.
Graham McFee (2005). The Artistic and the Aesthetic. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (4):368-387.
James Shelley (2004). Hume's Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
Robert Hopkins (2007). Speaking Through Silence : Conceptual Art and Conversational Implicature. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press
Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast & Mohammad Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast (2011). Aesthetic Formalism, Reactions and Solutions. Wisdom and Philosophy 6 (4):101-112.
Brandon Cooke (2007). Imagining Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):29-45.
Noël Carroll (2004). Non-Perceptual Aesthetic Properties: Comments for James Shelley. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):413-423.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads84 ( #50,360 of 1,907,383 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #198,541 of 1,907,383 )
How can I increase my downloads?