Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):315 - 333 (2007)
|Abstract||This article examines how business students route themselves through the process of cognitive moral development (CMD) to arrive at a more autonomous level of CMD when there is an impetus to do so. In this study, two groups were given Rest’s Defining Issues Test; half the test 1 week and half three weeks later. In between, one group viewed a film of Milgram’s obedience study as a stimulus towards a more autonomous level of CMD. The results of the analysis indicate that viewing the Milgram study produced a positive response regarding subjects’ level of autonomous CMD. However, the response was not uniform across the subject pool. Females showed a greater consistent significant positive response to viewing Milgram while male subjects varied their response contingent upon their functional area of study. While subjects’ functional area of study alone made little difference in the results, when taken in conjunction with gender, significant differences were found between groups. Thus, researchers should take care when investigating differences between subjects’ area of study since gender differences may be present even within an apparently homogenous population-like business students.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Olivera Petrovich (1982). Moral Development Among Mildly Mentally Handicapped School Children. Journal of Moral Education 11 (4):233-246.
Jayantha S. Wimalasiri, Francis Pavri & Abdul A. K. Jalil (1996). An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers in Singapore. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (12):1331 - 1341.
R. Eric Reidenbach (1996). The Empirical Performance of Cognitive Moral Development in Predicting Behavioral Intent. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (4):493-516.
John Fraedrich, Debbie M. Thorne & O. C. Ferrell (1994). Assessing the Application of Cognitive Moral Development Theory to Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):829 - 838.
Chiharu Ishida (2006). How Do Scores of DIT and MJT Differ? A Critical Assessment of the Use of Alternative Moral Development Scales in Studies of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):63 - 74.
Harsh K. Luthar & Ranjan Karri (2005). Exposure to Ethics Education and the Perception of Linkage Between Organizational Ethical Behavior and Business Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4):353 - 368.
Beverly Kracher & Robert P. Marble (2008). The Significance of Gender in Predicting the Cognitive Moral Development of Business Practitioners Using the Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (4):503 - 526.
Djilali Bouhmama (1984). Assessment of Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development in Two Cultures. Journal of Moral Education 13 (2):124-132.
Miguel Pina E. Cunha, Arménio Rego & Stewart R. Clegg (forthcoming). Obedience and Evil: From Milgram and Kampuchea to Normal Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics.
Sharie McNamee (1977). Moral Behaviour, Moral Development and Motivation. Journal of Moral Education 7 (1):27-31.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?