David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):509-524 (2011)
Psychologists debate whether mental attributes can be quantified or whether they admit only qualitative comparisons of more and less. Their disagreement is not merely terminological, for it bears upon the permissibility of various statistical techniques. This article contributes to the discussion in two stages. First it explains how temperature, which was originally a qualitative concept, came to occupy its position as an unquestionably quantitative concept (§§1–4). Specifically, it lays out the circumstances in which thermometers, which register quantitative (or cardinal) differences, became distinguishable from thermoscopes, which register merely qualitative (or ordinal) differences. I argue that this distinction became possible thanks to the work of Joseph Black, ca. 1760. Second, the article contends that the model implicit in temperature’s quantitative status offers a better way for thinking about the quantitative status of mental attributes than models from measurement theory (§§5–6).
|Keywords||Measurement theory History of thermometry Psychological measurement|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Paul Benacerraf (1973). Mathematical Truth. Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
Hilary Putnam (1972). Philosophy of Logic. London,Allen and Unwin.
Eugene Wigner (1960). The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13:1-14.
Penelope Maddy (1992). Indispensability and Practice. Journal of Philosophy 89 (6):275-289.
Patrick Suppes & Joseph Zinnes (1963). Basic Measurement Theory. In D. Luce (ed.), Journal of Symbolic Logic. John Wiley & Sons. 1--1.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Luca Mari (2005). The Problem of Foundations of Measurement. Measurement 38 (4):259-266.
Luca Mari (2003). Epistemology of Measurement. Measurement 34 (1):17-30.
Ludwik Finkelstein (2003). Widely, Strongly and Weakly Defined Measurement. Measurement 34 (1):39-48.
Giovanni Rossi (2006). A Probabilistic Theory of Measurement. Measurement 39:34-50.
Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2012). Measurement, Models, and Uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 61 (8):2144 - 2152.
Ludwik Finkelstein (1984). A Review of the Fundamental Concepts of Measurement. [REVIEW] Measurement 2 (1):25-34.
Ludwik Finkelstein (2009). Widely-Defined Measurement. An Analysis of Challenges. Measurement 42 (9):1270–1277.
Luca Mari (2000). Beyond the Representational Viewpoint: A New Formalization of Measurement. Measurement 27 (2):71-84.
Ludwik Finkelstein (1994). Measurement and Instrumentation Science. An Analytical Review. Measurement 14 (1):3-14.
Jeffrey Helzner (2012). On the Representation of Error. Synthese 186 (2):601-613.
Reinhard Niederée (1992). What Do Numbers Measure? A New Approach to Fundamental Measurement. Mathematical Social Sciences 24:237-276.
Aldo Frigerio, Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2010). Outline of a General Model of Measurement. Synthese 175 (2):123-149.
Fred S. Roberts (ed.) (1985). Measurement Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Henry E. Kyburg (ed.) (1984). Theory and Measurement. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-10-28
Total downloads113 ( #25,787 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?