David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 41 (1):117-142 (2012)
The field of moral psychology would benefit from an integrative model of what develops in moral development, contextualized within the larger scope of social science research. Moral sensibility is proposed as the best concept to embody stated aims, but the content of this concept must be more finely articulated and conceptualized as a dynamic system. Moral sensibility is defined here as a developing dynamic interaction of (1) a host of developing capacities for morally relevant knowing (e.g. moral reasoning, self-awareness and means to other-awareness?compassionate caring, empathy, perspective taking); (2) one?s socio-cultural moral assumptions and expressions; (3) one?s idiodynamic ideology (the developing set of consciously chosen values and value-laden understandings gleaned from experiencing one?s unique life history); (4) one?s morally relevant identities and self-understandings; (5) all embodied in one?s moral being in-the-moment, the ability to enact one?s moral sensibility in each new instance of moral engagement.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Berger & Thomas Luckmann (1966/1990). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books.
John Dewey (1980). Theory of the Moral Life. Irvington Publishers.
R. M. Hare (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pedro Ortega Ruiz & Ramon Minguez Vallejos (1999). The Role of Compassion in Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 28 (1):5-17.
Matthew R. Silliman (2006). Sentience and Sensibility: A Conversation About Moral Philosophy. Parmenides Pub..
Joan L. Whipp, Terry J. Burant & Sharon M. Chubbuck (2007). The Presence and Possibility of Moral Sensibility in Beginning Pre-Service Teachers. Ethics and Education 2 (2):109-130.
Sharon M. Chubbuck, Terry J. Burant & Joan L. Whipp (2007). The Presence and Possibility of Moral Sensibility in Beginning Pre-Service Teachers. Ethics and Education 2 (2):109-130.
Minkang Kim & Derek Sankey (2009). Towards a Dynamic Systems Approach to Moral Development and Moral Education: A Response to the JME Special Issue, September 2008. Journal of Moral Education 38 (3):283-298.
John R. Wright (2006). Moral Discourse, Pluralism, and Moral Cognitivism. Metaphilosophy 37 (1):92–111.
Steven Hendley (2004). Speech and Sensibility: Levinas and Habermas on the Constitution of the Moral Point of View. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 37 (2):153-173.
Maike Albertzart (2013). Principle-Based Moral Judgement. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):339-354.
Frank Simon (1976). Moral Development; Some Suggested Implications for Teaching. Journal of Moral Education 5 (2):173-178.
Peter M. Nardi (1979). Moral Socialization: An Empirical Analysis of the Hogan Model. Journal of Moral Education 9 (1):10-16.
Andrew Sneddon (2007). A Social Model of Moral Dumbfounding: Implications for Studying Moral Reasoning and Moral Judgment. Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):731 – 748.
Susanne Bobzien (2006). Moral Responsibility and Moral Development in Epicurus’ Philosophy. In B. Reis & S. Haffmans (eds.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. CUP.
C. Daniel Batson (2011). What’s Wrong with Morality? Emotion Review 3 (3):230-236.
Peter E. Langford (1991). The Assessment of Moral Autonomy Within a Multidimensional Approach to the Development of Moral Reasoning. Journal of Moral Education 20 (1):55-78.
Added to index2012-02-21
Total downloads28 ( #66,415 of 1,101,833 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #68,160 of 1,101,833 )
How can I increase my downloads?