When True Judges Differ: Reply to Durà‐Vilà

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):345-348 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend my reading of Hume's "Of the Standard of Taste" against objections raised by Victor Durà‐Vilà. Two points are central to my defense. One is that Hume takes the joint verdict of true judges to indicate, rather than constitute, the standard of beauty. Two is that Hume requires a joint verdict because individual verdicts need not be expressive of human nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Papineau and durà-vilà.Peter J. Lewis - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):86-89.
Hume and the Joint Verdict of True Judges.James Shelley - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (2):145-153.
Courage in Art Appreciation: A Humean Perspective.V. Dura-Vila - 2014 - British Journal of Aesthetics 54 (1):77-95.
Reply to Putnam and Walsh.Partha Dasgupta - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (3):365-372.
Reply to Ahmed.Lee Walters - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):123-133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-28

Downloads
65 (#224,466)

6 months
7 (#174,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Shelley
Auburn University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references