Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Psychological Review 84 (2):128-90 (1977)
Tested the 2-process theory of detection, search, and attention presented by the current authors in a series of experiments. The studies demonstrate the qualitative difference between 2 modes of information processing: automatic detection and controlled search; trace the course of the learning of automatic detection, of categories, and of automatic-attention responses; and show the dependence of automatic detection on attending responses and demonstrate how such responses interrupt controlled processing and interfere with the focusing of attention. The learning of categories is shown to improve controlled search performance. A general framework for human information processing is proposed. The framework emphasizes the roles of automatic and controlled processing. The theory is compared to and contrasted with extant models of search and attention
|Keywords||*Attention *Classification *Cognitive Processes *Practice *Visual Discrimination Theories|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sophie K. Scott & Richard J. S. Wise (2004). The Functional Neuroanatomy of Prelexical Processing in Speech Perception. Cognition 92 (1-2):13-45.
Brian J. Scholl & Patrice D. Tremoulet (2000). Perceptual Causality and Animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (8):299-309.
Keith Frankish (2010). Dual-Process and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):914-926.
Ulrich Ansorge, Wilfried Kunde & Markus Kiefer (2014). Unconscious Vision and Executive Control: How Unconscious Processing and Conscious Action Control Interact. Consciousness and Cognition 27:268-287.
Dana Schneider, Zoie E. Nott & Paul E. Dux (2014). Task Instructions and Implicit Theory of Mind. Cognition 133 (1):43-47.
Similar books and articles
M. Brownstein & A. Madva (2012). Ethical Automaticity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):68-98.
B. Valdés, A. Catena & P. Marí-Beffa (2005). Automatic and Controlled Semantic Processing: A Masked Prime-Task Effect. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2):278-295.
Robert D. Oades & Boutheina Jemel (2001). Where the Magic Breaks Down: Boundaries and the “Focus-of-Attention” in Schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):135-136.
Sandra L. Schneider (2000). An Elitist Naturalistic Fallacy and the Automatic-Controlled Continuum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):695-696.
Max Velmans (1991). Is Human Information Processing Conscious? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):651-69.
Joseph Tzelgov, Dana Ganor & Vered Yehene (1999). Automatic Processing Results in Conscious Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):786-787.
Hadas Shintel & Howard C. Nusbaum (2004). Dialogue Processing: Automatic Alignment or Controlled Understanding? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):210-211.
Daniel M. Wegner (2005). Who is the Controller of Controlled Processes? In Ran R. Hassin, James S. Uleman & John A. Bargh (eds.), The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience. Oxford University Press 19-36.
Walter E. Schneider & Richard M. Shiffrin (1977). Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: I. Detection, Search, and Attention. Psychological Review 84:1-66.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads124 ( #30,146 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #98,118 of 1,796,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?