Philosophy Compass 3 (5):992-1012 (2008)
|Abstract||This article treats three aspects of Frege's discussions of definitions. First, I survey Frege's main criticisms of definitions in mathematics. Second, I consider Frege's apparent change of mind on the legitimacy of contextual definitions and its significance for recent neo-Fregean logicism. In the remainder of the article I discuss a critical question about the definitions on which Frege's proofs of the laws of arithmetic depend: do the logical structures of the definientia reflect the understanding of arithmetical terms prevailing prior to Frege's analyses? Unless they do, it is unclear how Frege's proofs demonstrate the analyticity of the arithmetic in use before logicism. Yet, especially in late writings, Frege characterizes definitions as arbitrary stipulations of the senses or references of expressions unrelated to pre-definitional understanding. I conclude by examining some options for conceiving of the status of Frege's logicism in light of this apparent tension, and outline a suggestion for a philosophically fruitful way of resolving this tension.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robin Jeshion (2001). Frege's Notions of Self-Evidence. Mind 110 (440):937-976.
Marco Antonio Ruffino (1991). Context Principle, Fruitfulness of Logic and the Cognitive Value of Arithmetic in Frege. History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (2):185-194.
Tyler Burge (1998). Frege on Knowing the Foundation. Mind 107 (426):305-347.
Richard Heck (1993). The Development of Arithmetic in Frege's Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):579-601.
Sanford Shieh (2009). Teaching & Learning Guide For: Frege on Definitions. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):885-888.
Richard Heck (2011). Ramified Frege Arithmetic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (6):715-735.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #14,354 of 549,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,126 )
How can I increase my downloads?