David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Interaction Studies 12 (3):430-460 (2012)
Based on an integrated theoretical framework, this study analyzes user acceptance behavior toward socially interactive robots focusing on the variables that influence the users' attitudes and intentions to adopt robots. Individuals' responses to questions about attitude and intention to use robots were collected and analyzed according to different factors modified from a variety of theories. The results of the proposed model explain that social presence is key to the behavioral intention to accept social robots. The proposed model shows the significant roles of perceived adaptivity and sociability, both of which affect attitude as well as influence perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment, respectively. These factors can be key features of users' expectations of social robots, which can give practical implications for designing and developing meaningful social interaction between robots and humans. The new set of variables is specific to social robots, acting as factors that enhance attitudes and behavioral intentions in human-robot interactions. Keywords: Robot acceptance model; Socially interactive robots; Social robots; Social presence
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Guy Hoffman (2012). Embodied Cognition for Autonomous Interactive Robots. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (4):759-772.
Robert Sparrow & Linda Sparrow (2006). In the Hands of Machines? The Future of Aged Care. Minds and Machines 16 (2):141-161.
Min-Sun Kim & Eun-Joo Kim (2013). Humanoid Robots as “The Cultural Other”: Are We Able to Love Our Creations? [REVIEW] AI and Society 28 (3):309-318.
Kerstin Dautenhahn, Bernard Ogden, Tom Quick & Tom Ziemke (2002). From Embodied to Socially Embedded Agents: Implications for Interaction-Aware Robots. Cognitive Systems Research 3 (1):397-427.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2012). Can We Trust Robots? Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.
Kerstin Fischer, Kilian Foth, Katharina J. Rohlfing & Britta Wrede (2011). Mindful Tutors: Linguistic Choice and Action Demonstration in Speech to Infants and a Simulated Robot. Interaction Studies 12 (1):134-161.
Tatsuya Nomura, Takugo Tasaki, Takayuki Kanda, Masahiro Shiomi, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Norihiro Hagita (2006). Questionnaire-Based Social Research on Opinions of Japanese Visitors for Communication Robots at an Exhibition. AI and Society 21 (1-2):167-183.
Christopher Grau (2011). There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised). In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. 451.
Amanda Sharkey & Noel Sharkey (2012). Granny and the Robots: Ethical Issues in Robot Care for the Elderly. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):27-40.
Aleksandra Kupferberg, Stefan Glasauer, Markus Huber, Markus Rickert, Alois Knoll & Thomas Brandt (2011). Biological Movement Increases Acceptance of Humanoid Robots as Human Partners in Motor Interaction. AI and Society 26 (4):339-345.
Raya A. Jones (2013). Relationalism Through Social Robotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (4):405-424.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2010). Moral Appearances: Emotions, Robots, and Human Morality. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):235-241.
Brian Mennecke, Janea L. Triplett, Lesya M. Hassall, Rex Heer & Zayira Jordán Conde, Embodied Social Presence Theory.
Ludovic Marin & Olivier Oullier (2001). When Robots Fail: The Complex Processes of Learning and Development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1067-1068.
Added to index2011-12-07
Total downloads19 ( #73,391 of 1,004,649 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #22,116 of 1,004,649 )
How can I increase my downloads?