David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 39 (2):225-233 (2003)
This paper is a brief reply to Henry Simoni's ‘Divine passibility and the problem of radical particularity: does God feel your pain?’ in Religious Studies, 33 (1997). I treat his discussion of my paper entitled ‘Hartshorne and Creel on impassibility’, Process Studies, 21 (1992). I argue that Simoni's examples used to illustrate the purportedly contradictory nature of the experiences of a God who universally feels creaturely states fail. For Simoni tacitly employs an inadequate notion of the law of non-contradiction, and thereby misses the relevant phenomenological fact that it is possible for human beings to have integrated mental states that contain spatially distinctive but conflicting hedonic properties. Thus, it is possible for God (at least under Hartshornean descriptions) to have such experiences. I also argue that I have not ‘exploited an isolated passage’ in Hartshorne to make his views seem more palatable. The point of the passage in question is in fact repeated by Hartshorne and is systematically connected with his doctrine of the ‘objective and subjective form of feeling’.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rik Peels (2013). Is Omniscience Impossible? Religious Studies 49 (4):481-490.
Henry Simoni (1997). Omniscience and the Problem of Radical Particularity: Does God Know How to Ride a Bike? [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (1):1-22.
Henry Simoni-Wastila (2002). Māyā and Radical Particularity: Can Particular Persons Be One with Brahman? [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 6 (1):1-18.
Henry Simoni-Wastila (1999). Is Divine Relativity Possible? Process Studies 28 (1/2):98-116.
Henry Simoni-Wastila (2000). Particularity and Consciousness: Wittgenstein and Nagel on Privacy, Beetles and Bats. Philosophy Today 44 (4):415-425.
Thomas Metcalf (2004). Omniscience and Maximal Power. Religious Studies 40 (3):289-306.
Jason A. Beyer (2004). A Physicalist Rejoinder to Some Problems with Omniscience; or, How God Could Know What We Know. Sophia 43 (2):5-13.
Torin Alter (2002). On Two Alleged Conflicts Between Divine Attributes. Faith and Philosophy 19 (1):47-57.
P. J. Markie (2009). Political Obligation and the Particularity Problem. Ratio 22 (3):322-337.
Henry Simoni (1997). Divine Passibility and the Problem of Radical Particularity: Does God Feel Your Pain? Religious Studies 33 (3):327-347.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #384,383 of 1,941,080 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #149,738 of 1,941,080 )
How can I increase my downloads?