The forgotten individual: diagrammatic reasoning in mathematics

Synthese 186 (1):149-168 (2012)
Abstract
Parallelism has been drawn between modes of representation and problem-sloving processes: Diagrams are more useful for brainstorming while symbolic representation is more welcomed in a formal proof. The paper gets to the root of this clear-cut dualistic picture and argues that the strength of diagrammatic reasoning in the brainstorming process does not have to be abandoned at the stage of proof, but instead should be appreciated and could be preserved in mathematical proofs
Keywords Diagrammatic reasoning  Token fallacy  Formalization  Generalization  Individualization
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,398
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
David Hilbert (1899). The Foundations of Geometry. Open Court Company (This Edition Published 1921).

View all 6 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Iulian D. Toader (2004). On Frege's Logical Diagrams. In A. Blackwell, K. Marriott & A. Shimojima (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Springer. 22--25.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-03-20

Total downloads

20 ( #81,893 of 1,096,953 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #273,368 of 1,096,953 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.