David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics 121 (3):602-632 (2011)
Recently T. M. Scanlon and others have advanced an ostensibly comprehensive theory of moral responsibility—a theory of both being responsible and being held responsible—that best accounts for our moral practices. I argue that both aspects of the Scanlonian theory fail this test. A truly comprehensive theory must incorporate and explain three distinct conceptions of responsibility—attributability, answerability, and accountability—and the Scanlonian view conflates the first two and ignores the importance of the third. To illustrate what a truly comprehensive theory might look like, I investigate what it would say about the difficult case of the psychopath.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Matthew Talbert (2008). Blame and Responsiveness to Moral Reasons: Are Psychopaths Blameworthy? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):516-535.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Evan Franklin (2015). Everyone Thinks That an Ability to Do Otherwise is Necessary for Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2091-2107.
Michael Brownstein (2014). Rationalizing Flow: Agency in Skilled Unreflective Action. Philosophical Studies 168 (2):545-568.
Conor McHugh (2013). Epistemic Responsibility and Doxastic Agency. Philosophical Issues 23 (1):132-157.
Michael Brownstein (forthcoming). Attributionism and Moral Responsibility for Implicit Bias. Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-22.
D. Justin Coates & Neal A. Tognazzini (2012). The Nature and Ethics of Blame. Philosophy Compass 7 (3):197-207.
Similar books and articles
Matthew Talbert (2012). Accountability, Aliens, and Psychopaths: A Reply to Shoemaker. Ethics 122 (3):562-574.
Arthur Ripstein (2004). Justice and Responsibility. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 17 (2):361-386.
Marina Oshana (2004). Moral Accountability. Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2):255-274.
Antony Duff (2009). Legal and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Angela M. Smith (2012). Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: In Defense of a Unified Account. Ethics 122 (3):575-589.
Simo Vehmas (2011). Disability and Moral Responsibility. TRAMES 15 (2):156-167.
John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Coleen Macnamara (2011). Holding Others Responsible. Philosophical Studies 152 (1):81-102.
Thomas W. Smythe (1999). Moral Responsibility. Journal of Value Inquiry 33 (4):493-506.
John Martin Fischer (2006). My Way: Essays on Moral Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
Jeffery Smith (2011). A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
Wim Dubbink & Jeffery Smith (2011). A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223-246.
John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza (eds.) (1993). Perspectives on Moral Responsibility. Cornell University Press.
Neil Levy (2007). The Responsibility of the Psychopath Revisited. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (2):pp. 129-138.
Added to index2012-03-24
Total downloads213 ( #14,738 of 1,934,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #29,809 of 1,934,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?