Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophical Research 16:251-291 (1991)
|Abstract||Causal processes that are technically called deviant or wayward causal chains must be ruled out when analyzing various phenomena, including intentional action, perception, and the operation of causal mechanisms involved in the manifesting of causal powers. Irving Thalberg is incorrect in arguing that this problem does not arise when analyzing intentional action. After criticizing solutions proposed by Christopher Peacocke and David Lewis, I provide a general analysis of non-deviance. In application to intentional action, the account is seen to be preferable to that of Michael H. Robins, and proves to be adequate to rule out what Alfred R. Mele calls cases of tertiary waywardness|
|Keywords||Causation Phenomena Psychologist Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sarah K. Paul (2011). Deviant Formal Causation. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (3).
John M. Connolly (1991). Whither Action Theory. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:85-106.
Markus E. Schlosser (2010). Bending It Like Beckham: Movement, Control and Deviant Causal Chains. Analysis 70 (2):299-303.
Markus E. Schlosser (2007). Basic Deviance Reconsidered. Analysis 67 (295):186–194.
Berent Enç (2004). Causal Theories of Intentional Behavior and Wayward Causal Chains. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):149 - 166.
Alfred R. Mele (1987). Intentional Action and Wayward Causal Chains: The Problem of Tertiary Waywardness. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 51 (1):55 - 60.
Markus E. Schlosser (2011). The Metaphysics of Rule-Following. Philosophical Studies 155 (3):345-369.
Ralph Wedgwood (2006). The Normative Force of Reasoning. Noûs 40 (4):660–686.
Robert K. Shope (1996). Nondeviant Chains in Intentional Action. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:15-49.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,770 of 723,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?