Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Sydney Shoemaker (1990). Qualities and Qualia: What's in the Mind? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Supplement 50 (Supplement):109-131.
Similar books and articles
The Dangerous Book for Boys Abstract: Seventeenth and eighteenth century discussions of the senses are often thought to contain a profound truth: some perceptible properties are secondary qualities, dispositions to produce certain sorts of experiences in perceivers. In particular, colors are secondary qualities: for example, an object is green iff it is disposed to look green to standard perceivers in standard conditions. After rebutting Boghossian and Velleman’s argument that a certain kind of secondary quality theory is viciously circular, we discuss three main lines of argument for the secondary quality theory. The first is inspired by an intuitively compelling picture of perception articulated by Reid; the second is that the secondary quality theory is a conceptual truth; the third line of argument is presented in Johnston’s influential paper ‘How to speak of the colors’. We conclude that all these arguments fail, and that the secondary quality theory is unmotivated. Keywords: color, secondary quality, disposition, vision, perception..
Discussion of Sydney Shoemaker, Qualities and qualia: What's in the mind?
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

