Reply to Leeds

Noûs 36 (1):130-136 (2002)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Experience  Metaphysics  Perception  Property  Leeds, S
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0068.00364
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Michael Pace (2007). Blurred Vision and the Transparency of Experience. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):328–354.
Dave Ward (2016). Achieving Transparency: An Argument For Enactivism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (3):650-680.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Huw Price (1994). Reinterpreting the Wheeler--Feynman Absorber Theory: Reply to Leeds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1023-1028.
Stephen Leeds (1995). Wheeler--Feynman Again: A Reply to Price. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):381-383.
Henry E. Kyburg (1985). Another Reply to Leeds. Philosophical Studies 48 (1):145 - 148.
John L. Pollock (1985). Reply to Leeds. Philosophical Studies 48 (1):141 - 144.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

16 ( #280,699 of 1,921,718 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #453,081 of 1,921,718 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.