David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philo 5 (2):143-160 (2002)
Before being able to answer key practical questions dependent on a criterion of personal identity (e.g., am I justified in anticipating surviving the death of my body?), we must first determine which general approach to the issue of personal identity is more plausible, reductionism or non-reductionism. While reductionism has become the more dominant approach amongst philosophical theorists over the past thirty years, non-reductionism remains an approach that, for all these theorists have shown, could very well still be true. My aim in this paper is to show that non-reductionism is actually either irrelevant – with respect to the practical questions we want answered – or logically impossible. In arguing for this conclusion, I draw from a case Derek Parfit has employed – the Combined Spectrum – and I provide a number of variations to it which ultimately reveal that we have no possible rational recourse other than to become reductionists.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Matt Duncan (2014). A Challenge to Anti-Criterialism. Erkenntnis 79 (2):283-296.
Similar books and articles
Timothy Chappell (1998). Reductionism About Persons; and What Matters. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (1):41-58.
Brian J. Garrett (1991). Personal Identity and Reductionism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (June):361-373.
Amy Kind (2004). The Metaphysics of Personal Identity and Our Special Concern for the Future. Metaphilosophy 35 (4):536-553.
Gereon Kopf (2002). Temporality and Personal Identity in the Thought of Nishida Kitaro. Philosophy East and West 52 (2):224-245.
James Baillie (1993). Recent Work on Personal Identity. Philosophical Books 34 (4):193-206.
Roy W. Perrett & Charles Barton (1999). Personal Identity, Reductionism, and the Necessity of Origins. Erkenntnis 51 (2-3):277-94.
Quassim Cassam (1989). Kant and Reductionism. Review of Metaphysics 43 (September):72-106.
Jens Johansson (2007). Non-Reductionism and Special Concern. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):641 – 657.
Mark Johnston (1992). Reasons and Reductionism. Philosophical Review 3 (3):589-618.
Harold Langsam (2001). Pain, Personal Identity, and the Deep Further Fact. Erkenntnis 54 (2):247-271.
Daniel Giberman (2009). Who They Are and What de Se: Burge on Quasi-Memory. Philosophical Studies 144 (2):297 - 311.
Anne Jaap Jacobson (2005). Is the Brain a Memory Box? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):271-278.
Deborah C. Smith (2001). Parfit on Personal Identity. Idealistic Studies 31 (2/3):169-181.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads78 ( #21,333 of 1,409,992 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #18,862 of 1,409,992 )
How can I increase my downloads?