Wide and narrow scope

Philosophical Studies 163 (3):717-736 (2013)
Offers a conciliatory solution to one of the central contemporary debates in the theory of rationality, the debate about the proper formulation of rational requirements. Introduces a novel conception of the “symmetry problem” for wide scope rational requirements, and sketches a theory of rational commitment as a response.
Keywords Rationality  Normativity  Wide scoping  Broome
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-011-9841-z
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,631
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Michael Bratman (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Center for the Study of Language and Information.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Christopher J. G. Meacham (2016). Understanding Conditionalization. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (5-6):767-797.
Sam Shpall (2014). Moral and Rational Commitment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):146-172.
Mark Schroeder (2013). Scope for Rational Autonomy. Philosophical Issues 23 (1):297-310.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

404 ( #4,618 of 1,938,807 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

59 ( #6,991 of 1,938,807 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.