David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 163 (3):717-736 (2013)
In this paper I present an original and relatively conciliatory solution to one of the central contemporary debates in the theory of rationality, the debate about the proper formulation of rational requirements. I begin by offering my own version of the “symmetry problem” for wide scope rational requirements, and I show how this problem necessitates the introduction of a normative concept other than the traditional notions of reason and requirement. I then sketch a theory of rational commitment , showing how this notion solves the symmetry problem as I’ve presented it. I also show that the concept of rational commitment is one we already appeal to in common sense discourse, and that it is necessary for vindicating comparative judgments of rationality.
|Keywords||Rationality Normativity Wide scoping Broome|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. D. Ross (2002). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press.
Jonathan Dancy (2004). Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.
Michael Bratman (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
John Broome (2013). Rationality Through Reasoning. Wiley-Blackwell.
Jonathan Dancy (2000). Practical Reality. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher J. G. Meacham (2016). Understanding Conditionalization. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (5-6):767-797.
Sam Shpall (2014). Moral and Rational Commitment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):146-172.
Michael G. Titelbaum (2015). How to Derive a Narrow-Scope Requirement From Wide-Scope Requirements. Philosophical Studies 172 (2):535-542.
Mark Schroeder (2013). Scope for Rational Autonomy. Philosophical Issues 23 (1):297-310.
Herlinde Pauer-Studer (2014). Rational Requirements and Reasoning. Economics and Philosophy 30 (3):513-528.
Similar books and articles
John Brunero (2010). The Scope of Rational Requirements. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):28-49.
John Broome (2007). Wide or Narrow Scope? Mind 116 (462):359-370.
Niko Kolodny (2007). State or Process Requirements? Mind 116 (462):371-385.
Andrew Reisner (2009). Unifying the Requirements of Rationality. Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):243-260.
John Brunero (2012). Instrumental Rationality, Symmetry and Scope. Philosophical Studies 157 (1):125-140.
Errol Lord (2011). Violating Requirements, Exiting From Requirements, and the Scope of Rationality. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):392-399.
Jonathan Way (2010). The Normativity of Rationality. Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1057-1068.
Jonathan Way (2011). The Symmetry of Rational Requirements. Philosophical Studies 155 (2):227-239.
Simon Rippon (2011). In Defense of the Wide-Scope Instrumental Principle. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (2):1-21.
Daan Evers (2011). Two Objections to Wide-Scoping. Grazer Philosophische Studien 83 (13):251-255.
Niko Kolodny (2005). Why Be Rational? Mind 114 (455):509-563.
Julian Fink (2010). Asymmetry, Scope, and Rational Consistency. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):109-130.
Jonathan Way (2010). Defending the Wide-Scope Approach to Instrumental Reason. Philosophical Studies 147 (2):213 - 233.
Markos Valaris (2012). Instrumental Rationality. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):443-462.
Added to index2011-12-13
Total downloads387 ( #4,436 of 1,907,520 )
Recent downloads (6 months)90 ( #4,766 of 1,907,520 )
How can I increase my downloads?