Abortion and Social Responsibility: Depolarizing the Debate

OUP USA (2003)
Abstract Schrage argues that Roe v Wade's regulatory scheme of a six-month time span for abortion on demand polarized the public and obscured alternatives with potentially broader support. She explores the origins of that scheme, then defends an alternate one-with a time span shorter than 6 months for non-therapeutic abortions-that could win broad support needed to make legal abortion services available to all women.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Buy the book $9.60 used (93% off)   $70.40 new (44% off)   $125.00 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9780195153088   0195153081
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,711
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Ann Garry (1983). Abortion: Models of Responsibility. Law and Philosophy 2 (3):371 - 396.
    David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
    Richard Schoenig (1998). Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
    Lara Denis (2008). Animality and Agency: A Kantian Approach to Abortion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):117–137.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-01-31

    Total downloads

    5 ( #160,544 of 551,119 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,341 of 551,119 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums