Radiobiology and gray science: Flaws in landmark new radiation protections

Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):167-169 (2005)
The International Commission on Radiological Protection — whose regularly updated recommendations are routinely adopted as law throughout the globe — recently issued the first-ever ICRP protections for the environment. These draft 2005 proposals are significant both because they offer the commission’s first radiation protections for any non-human parts of the planet and because they will influence both the quality of radiation risk assessment and environmental protection, as well as the global costs of nuclear-weapons cleanup, reactor decommissioning and radioactive waste management. This piece argues that the 2005 recommendations are scientifically and ethically flawed, or gray, in at least three respects: first, in largely ignoring scientific journals while employing mainly “gray literature;” second, in relying on non-transparent dose estimates and models, rather than on actual radiation measurements; and third, in ignoring classical ethical constraints on acceptable radiation risk.
Keywords abiotic  dose  ecological risk assessment  International Commission on Radiological Protection  measurement  model  public health  radiation  transparency
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-005-0037-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,046
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
M. Frisch (2000). (Dis-)Solving the Puzzle of the Arrow of Radiation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):381-410.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

26 ( #157,460 of 1,934,429 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #58,753 of 1,934,429 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.