David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):1-23 (2002)
: Workers generally face higher levels of pollution and risk in their workplace than members of the public. Economists justify the double standard (for workplace versus public exposures to various pollutants) on the grounds of the compensating wage differential (CWD). The CWD, or hazard-pay premium, is the increment in wages, all things being equal, that workers in hazardous environments receive, as compared to other workers. Economists defend the CWD by asserting that workers willingly trade safety for extra money. This essay (1) examines the theory behind the CWD, (2) presents and evaluates economists' Market-Efficiency Argument for the CWD, (3) offers several reasons for questioning the CWD, and (4) applies the Market-Efficiency Argument to a real-world case, that of U.S. nuclear workers. The essay concludes that this argument fails to justify the CWD, at least in the case of U.S. nuclear workers.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ethan Wilding (2012). Framing Ethical Acceptability: A Problem with Nuclear Waste in Canada. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):301-313.
Similar books and articles
Gerald E. Fryxell (1992). Perceptions of Justice Afforded by Formal Grievance Systems as Predictors of a Belief in a Just Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (8):635 - 647.
Erkki Koskela & Panu Poutvaara, Flexible Outsourcing and the Impacts of Labour Taxation in European Welfare States.
Philippa Smales (2010). Living Wages and Institutional Supply Chain Duties. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1/4):109-134.
Ian Maitland (1989). Rights in the Workplace: A Nozickian Argument. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):951 - 954.
Konrad Fuchs (1985). Emigrants - Itinerant Workers - Guest Workers. Population, Labour Market and Migration in Germany Since the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Philosophy and History 18 (2):143-144.
Marina Prieto-Carrón (2008). Women Workers, Industrialization, Global Supply Chains and Corporate Codes of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (1):5 - 17.
William S. Brown (2000). Ontological Security, Existential Anxiety and Workplace Privacy. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (1):61 - 65.
Chris Forde & Robert MacKenzie (2010). The Ethical Agendas of Employment Agencies Towards Migrant Workers in the UK: Deciphering the Codes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 97 (S1):31-41.
Kristin Shrader-Frechette (2002). Trading Jobs for Health: Ionizing Radiation, Occupational Ethics, and the Welfare Argument. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):139-154.
Kristin Shrader-Frechette (2002). Risky Businessnuclear Workers, Ethics, and the Market-Efficiency Argument. Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):1-23.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #162,931 of 1,934,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #146,211 of 1,934,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?