The Philosophical Case for Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis

Journal of Philosophy 80 (9999):659-660 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science, democracy, and public policy.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2):255-264.
Economics, Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis, and the Linearity Assumption.K. S. Shrader-Frechette - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:217 - 232.
Rationalizing Risks to Cultural Loss in Resource Development.Sari Graben - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 26 (1):83-114.
Costs and Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Response to Bantz and MacLean.Peter Railton - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:261-271.
Philosophical problems in cost–benefit analysis.Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (2):163-183.
Risk-Benefit Analysis: From a Logical Point of View. [REVIEW]Georg Spielthenner - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):161-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
39 (#398,894)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristin Shrader-Frechette
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references