Graduate studies at Western
Stanford University Press (1997)
|Abstract||Throughout much of Chinese history, Mencius (372-289 BC) was considered the greatest Confucian thinker after Confucius himself. Following the enshrinement of the Mencius (an edited compilation of his thought by disciples) as one of the Four Books by Sung neo-Confucianists, he was studied by all educated Chinese. This book begins a reassessment of Mencius by studying his ethical thinking in relation to that of other early Chinese thinkers, including Confucius, Mo Tzu, the Yangists, and Hsün Tzu. The author closely examines his ethical concepts and terms, showing how they were used in the Mencius and other texts.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$23.00 used (18% off) $24.87 new (12% off) $24.90 direct from Amazon (11% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B128.M324.S48 1997|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert E. Allinson (1998). The Debate Between Mencius and Hsün-Tzu: Contemporary Applications. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25 (1):31-49.
David Elstein, Xunzi. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Thomas Radice (2011). Manufacturing Mohism in the Mencius. Asian Philosophy 21 (2):139 - 152.
Wiebke Denecke (2010). The Dynamics of Masters Literature: Early Chinese Thought From Confucius to Han Feizi. Distributed by Harvard University Press.
Francisca Cho (2004). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. International Studies in Philosophy 36 (1):299-300.
Shu-hsien Liu & Kwong-loi Shun (1996). Some Reflections on Mencius' Views of Mind-Heart and Human Nature. Philosophy East and West 46 (2):143-164.
Mencius (2009). Mencius. Columbia University Press.
Kwong-Loi Shun (1991). Mencius and the Mind-Inherence of Morality: Mencius' Rejection of Kao Tzu's Maxim in Meng Tzu 2a:2 1: I. Kao Tzu's Maxim. [REVIEW] Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18 (4):371-386.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,083 of 739,407 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,256 of 739,407 )
How can I increase my downloads?