David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):409-411 (2002)
In “Innocuous Infallibility,” Earl Conee argues that the infallibility to which I argue Internalism is committed, in “An Argument that Internalism Requires Infallibility,” is harmless and trivial. I maintain that this overlooks the fact that Internalism makes use of an intuitive notion of ‘epistemic twinhood’ to drive its position, rather than one antecedently defined with a filled-out notion of ‘relevant epistemic circumstances’. Conee is correct that any theory requires, and trivially gets, some sort of infallibility---but it is not trivial that there is a coherent and univocal notion of the sort of relevant circumstances---and so, twinhood and infallibility---behind the Internalist strategy and motivation
|Keywords||internalism infallibility, Conee|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Elinor Mason (2008). An Argument Against Motivational Internalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1part2):135-156.
Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2001). Internalism Defended. American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (1):1 - 18.
Chris Tillman (2012). Reconciling Justificatory Internalism and Content Externalism. Synthese 187 (2):419-440.
Earl Conee (2004). Externalism, Internalism, and Skepticism. Philosophical Issues 14 (1):78–90.
Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2001). Internalism Defended. In Hilary Kornblith (ed.), Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Blackwell. 1 - 18.
Earl Conee (2007). Externally Enhanced Internalism. In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 51--67.
Alan Sidelle (2001). An Argument That Internalism Requires Infallibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):163-179.
Earl Conee (2002). Innocuous Infallibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):406 - 408.
Earl Conee (2002). Innocuous Infallibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):406-408.
Alan Sidelle (2002). Innoculi Innocula. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):409 - 411.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #56,272 of 1,140,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #88,260 of 1,140,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?