Noûs 33 (2):284–294 (1999)
|Abstract||Michael Jubien’s Ontology, Modality, and the Fallacy of Reference is an interesting and lively discussion of those three topics. In ontology, Jubien defends, to a first approximation, a Quinean conception: a world of objects that may be arbitrarily sliced or summed. Slicing yields temporal parts; summing yields aggregates, or fusions. Jubien is very unQuinean in his explicit Platonism regarding properties and propositions, but concerns about abstracta are peripheral to much of the argumentation in the book.1 His version of the doctrine that arbitrary mereological sums exist is nonstandard in that he views it as a convention (albeit a useful one) that we treat sums of objects as themselves being objects. Indeed, he views the concept of objecthood itself as being conventional. The world consists fundamentally of stuff, which we divide into things in any way that suits our purposes. In modality, Jubien’s views are to a first approximation Chisholmian: he holds the doctrine of mereological essentialism, according to which anything..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. Divers (2011). Possibility, by Michael Jubien. Mind 119 (476):1189-1193.
Michael Jubien (1991). Could This Be Magic. Philosophical Review 100 (2):249-267.
Michael J. Pendlebury (1982). Indexical Reference and the Ontology of Belief. South African Journal of Philosophy 1:65-74.
Leonard Linsky (1971). Reference and Modality. London,Oxford University Press.
Michael Jubien (1977). Ontology and Mathematical Truth. Noûs 11 (2):133-150.
Fernando Migura (1995). Ontology, Modality, and the Fallacy of Reference. Theoria 10 (2):231-234.
Michael Jubien (1993). Ontology, Modality, and the Fallacy of Reference. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #33,071 of 549,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,270 of 549,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?