Tooley's solution to the inference problem
Philosophical Studies 67 (3):261 - 275 (1992)
| Abstract | In response to various shortcomings of regularity theories of natural law, some philosophers of a realist bent have recently been drawn to the view that a law of nature is a relation between universals. Heading this group are Michael Tooley and D. M. Armstrong | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGregory Wheeler (2000). Error Statistics and Duhem's Problem. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):410-420.
Peter Vallentyne (1988). Explicating Lawhood. Philosophy of Science 55 (4):598-613.
Charles B. Cross (2006). Conditional Logic and the Significance of Tooley's Example. Analysis 66 (292):325–335.
Michael Tooley (1987). Causation: A Realist Approach. Oxford University Press.
Quentin Smith (1996). The Metaphysical Necessity of Natural Laws. Proceedings of the Heraclitean Society 18:104-23.
Joan Page`S. (2002). The Dretske–Tooley–Armstrong Theory of Natural Laws and the Inference Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227-243.
Joan Pag (2002). The Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong Theory of Natural Laws and the Inference Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227 – 243.
James Woodward (1992). Realism About Laws. Erkenntnis 36 (2):181-218.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,587 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
