Argument Quality and Cultural Difference

Argumentation 13 (2):183-201 (1999)
Abstract Central to argumentation theory is a concern with normativity. Argumentation theorists are concerned, among other things, with explaining why some arguments are good (or at least better than others) in the sense that a given argument provides reasons for embracing its conclusion which are such that a fair- minded appraisal of the argument yields the judgment that the conclusion ought to be accepted -- is worthy of acceptance -- by all who so appraise it
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,705
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Dan Passell (1997). Hume's Arguments for His Sceptical Doubts. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:409-422.
    G. Doore (1981). Functionalism and Absent Qualia. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (March):387-402.
    Alex Byrne (2002). Yes, Virginia, Lemons Are Yellow. Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):213-22.
    Margaret Moore (1999). Beyond the Cultural Argument for Liberal Nationalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (3):26-47.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-11

    Total downloads

    7 ( #133,587 of 549,198 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums