David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):397 – 412 (2004)
Ethics is normative; ethics indicates, in broad terms, what researchers should do. For example, researchers should respect human participants. Empirical study tells us what actually happens. Empirical research is often needed to fine-tune the best ways to achieve normative objectives, for example, to discover how best to achieve the dual aims of gaining important knowledge and respecting participants. Ethical decision making by scientists and institutional review boards should not be based on hunches and anecdotes (e.g., about such matters as what information potential research participants would want to know and what they understand, or what they consider to be acceptable risks). These questions should be answered through empirical research. Some of the preceding articles in this special issue illustrate uses of empirical research on research ethics. This article places empirical research on research ethics into broader perspective and challenges investigators to use the tools of their disciplines to proactively solve ethical problems for which there currently exist no empirically proven solutions.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Emily E. Anderson & James M. DuBois (2012). IRB Decision-Making with Imperfect Knowledge: A Framework for Evidence-Based Research Ethics Review. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):951-969.
Erika Löfström (2012). Students' Ethical Awareness and Conceptions of Research Ethics. Ethics and Behavior 22 (5):349 - 361.
Craig Fry (2009). How to Build a Theory About Empirical Bioethics: Acknowledging the Limitations of Empirical Research. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):83-85.
Similar books and articles
Joan E. E. Sieber (2005). Evidence-Based Ethical Problem Solving: An Idea Whose Time has Come. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (2-4):113-125.
Einar Marnburg (2001). The Questionable Use of Moral Development Theory in Studies of Business Ethics: Discussion and Empirical Findings. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):275 - 283.
Andrew Crane (1999). Are You Ethical? Please Tick Yes □ or No □ on Researching Ethics in Business Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 20 (3):237 - 248.
Guy Widdershoven (ed.) (2008). Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Vassilios P. Filios (1986). Review and Analysis of the Empirical Research in Corporate Social Accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):291 - 306.
Lieke van Der Scheer & Guy Widdershoven (2004). Integrated Empirical Ethics: Loss of Normativity? [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):71-79.
Albert W. Musschenga (2005). Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
Anthony D. Miyazaki & Kimberly A. Taylor (2008). Researcher Interaction Biases and Business Ethics Research: Respondent Reactions to Researcher Characteristics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):779 - 795.
Joan E. Sieber (2008). Empirical Research on Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research. Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):127 – 138.
Joan E. Sieber (2004). Introduction to the Special Issue: Using Our Best Judgment in Conducting Human Research. Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):297 – 304.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #110,961 of 1,934,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #196,346 of 1,934,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?