Geometrization Versus Transcendent Matter: A Systematic Historiography of Theories of Matter Following Weyl

This article investigates an intertwined systematic and historical view on theories of matter. It follows an approach brought forward by Hermann Weyl around 1925, applies it to recent theories of matter in physics (including geometrodynamics and quantum gravity), and embeds it into a more general philosophical framework. First, I shall discuss the physical and philosophical problems of a unified field theory on the basis of Weyl's own abandonment of his 1918 ‘pure field theory’ in favour of an ‘agent theory’ of matter. The difference between agent and field theories of matter is then used to establish a sort of dialectic meta-view. With reference to Weyl this view can be understood as being a particular Fichtean transcendental idealist approach which attempts to combine the strengths of the Husserlian phenomenology and Cassirer's neo-Kantianism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axq007
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Norman Sieroka & Eckehard W. Mielke (2014). Holography as a Principle in Quantum Gravity?—Some Historical and Systematic Observations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2):170-178.
Peter Pesic (2013). Hermann Weyl's Neighborhood. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):150-153.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Yvon Gauthier (2005). Hermann Weyl on Minkowskian Space-Time and Riemannian Geometry. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):261 – 269.
James Mattingly (2009). Mongrel Gravity. Erkenntnis 70 (3):379 - 395.
Norman Sieroka (2007). Weyl's 'Agens Theory' of Matter and the Zurich Fichte. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):84-107.
Max Velmans (2007). The Co-Evolution of Matter and Consciousness. Velmans, Prof Max (2007) the Co-Evolution of Matter and Consciousness. [Journal (Paginated)] 44 (2):273-282.
David Bohm (1990). A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):271 – 286.
Nick Huggett & Craig Callender (2001). Why Quantize Gravity (or Any Other Field for That Matter)? Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S382-.
David J. Bohm (1986). A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 80 (2 & 3):113-35.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

18 ( #150,602 of 1,725,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,161 of 1,725,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.