Geometrization Versus Transcendent Matter: A Systematic Historiography of Theories of Matter Following Weyl
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):769-802 (2010)
|Abstract||This article investigates an intertwined systematic and historical view on theories of matter. It follows an approach brought forward by Hermann Weyl around 1925, applies it to recent theories of matter in physics (including geometrodynamics and quantum gravity), and embeds it into a more general philosophical framework. First, I shall discuss the physical and philosophical problems of a unified field theory on the basis of Weyl's own abandonment of his 1918 ‘pure field theory’ in favour of an ‘agent theory’ of matter. The difference between agent and field theories of matter is then used to establish a sort of dialectic meta-view. With reference to Weyl this view can be understood as being a particular Fichtean transcendental idealist approach which attempts to combine the strengths of the Husserlian phenomenology and Cassirer's neo-Kantianism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Yvon Gauthier (2005). Hermann Weyl on Minkowskian Space-Time and Riemannian Geometry. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):261 – 269.
Maciej Gos (1996). Modele matematyczne w fizyce współczesnej a pdstawowe problemy ontologii czasoprzestrzeni. Filozofia Nauki 4.
Richard Feist (2002). Weyl's Appropriation of Husserl's and Poincaré's Thought. Synthese 132 (3):273 - 301.
James Mattingly (2009). Mongrel Gravity. Erkenntnis 70 (3):379 - 395.
Jairo José Da Silva (1997). Husserl's Phenomenology and Weyl's Predictivism. Synthese 110 (2):277 - 296.
Norman Sieroka (2007). Weyl's 'Agens Theory' of Matter and the Zurich Fichte. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):84-107.
Max Velmans (2007). The Co-Evolution of Matter and Consciousness. Velmans, Prof Max (2007) the Co-Evolution of Matter and Consciousness. [Journal (Paginated)] 44 (2):273-282.
Hermann Weyl (1922). Space-Time-Matter. E.P. Dutton and Company.
David Bohm (1990). A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):271 – 286.
Jonathan Beere (2006). Potentiality and the Matter of Composite Substance. Phronesis 51 (4):303-329.
Nick Huggett & Craig Callender (2001). Why Quantize Gravity (or Any Other Field for That Matter)? Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S382-.
David J. Bohm (1986). A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 80 (2 & 3):113-35.
Added to index2010-11-25
Total downloads13 ( #87,887 of 549,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?