David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 18:271-275 (1993)
This comment calls attention to the nature of the Aristotelian and classical logics, and the difficulty of representing their judgments and inferences by means of Venn diagrams. The meaning of ‘all’ in the different calculi produces problems. A second problem is that the specification of existence in Venn diagrams for statements and arguments cannot be restricted to a single class, overlooked by Wiebe. This problem is further complicated by his adoption of classical (Renaissance) syllogistic, which is inconsistent. Aristotle’s term logic is consistent. So also is the medieval extension, though the inclusion of singular premisses renders it less perspicuous though more flexible
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Phillip H. Wiebe (1991). Existential Assumptions for Aristotelian Logic. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:321-328.
Francine Abeles (2007). Lewis Carroll's Visual Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):1-17.
John Marenbon (ed.) (2007). The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions: Special Offprint of Vivarium 45, 2-3 (2007). [REVIEW] Brill.
Dwayne Hudson Mulder (1996). The Existential Assumptions of Traditional Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):141-154.
Victor J. Cieutat (1969). Traditional Logic and the Venn Diagram; a Programed Introduction. Science Research Associates, Chicago.
Valentin A. Bazhanov (2008). Non-Classical Stems From Classical: N. A. Vasiliev's Approach to Logic and His Reassessment of the Square of Opposition. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 2 (1):71-76.
Marko Malink (2006). A Reconstruction of Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic. History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (2):95-141.
Susanne Bobzien (2002). The Development of Modus Ponens in Antiquity: From Aristotle to the 2nd Century AD. Phronesis 47 (4):359 - 394.
Sun-Joo Shin (1994). Peirce and the Logical Status of Diagrams. History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):45-68.
Michael V. Wedin (1990). Negation and Quantification in Aristotle. History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (2):131-150.
Margaret Cameron & John Marenbon (eds.) (2011). Methods and Methodologies: Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500-1500. Brill.
Susanne Bobzien (2006). Logic, History Of: Ancient Logic. In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Thomson Gale.
Jacek Wojtysiak (1999). Metafizyka w logice. Filozofia Nauki 1.
Nathaniel Miller (2006). A Brief Proof of the Full Completeness of Shin's Venn Diagram Proof System. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):289 - 291.
John Venn (1888/2006). The Logic of Chance. Dover Publications.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #307,790 of 1,101,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,516 of 1,101,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?