Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):3-13 (2012)
|Abstract||This article examines the way that for-profit businesses should take into account the interests of the citizens in the liberal democratic societies in which they operate. I will show how a contractualist version of stakeholder theory identifies the relevant moral interests of both shareholders and citizen stakeholders, and provides a method for giving their interests appropriate consideration. These include (1) the interests that individuals have with respect to private property, (2) the interests citizens have in receiving equitable consideration in the political process, and (3) citizens' interests which give them the collective right to determine the legal and economic structure of their societies. Using this contractualist analysis, I argue that corporations should consciously take into account the interests of citizen stakeholders when there is no other social mechanism for protecting their interests as citizens|
|Keywords||Ethics Contractualism Democratic theory Political philosophy Stakeholder theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard H. Toenjes (2002). Why Be Moral in Business? A Rawlsian Approach to Moral Motivation. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (1):57-72.
Joshua Preiss (2009). Why Brian Barry Should Be a Multiculturalist. Social Theory and Practice 35 (2):229-249.
Andrew Crane, Dirk Matten & Jeremy Moon (2004). Stakeholders as Citizens? Rethinking Rights, Participation, and Democracy. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):107-122.
Marc A. Cohen (2010). The Narrow Application of Rawls in Business Ethics: A Political Conception of Both Stakeholder Theory and the Morality of Markets. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 97 (4):563-579.
Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens, J. van Oosterhout & Muel Kaptein (2006). Foundations and Applications for Contractualist Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):211 - 228.
Gabriel Wollner (2012). Egalitarianism, Numbers and the Dreaded Conclusion. Ethical Perspectives 19 (3):399-416.
Sybille Sachs, Ruth Schmitt & Hans Groth (2008). The Strategic Impact of Stakeholders' Perceptions. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:441-452.
Brian Harvey & Anja Schaefer (2001). Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 30 (3):243 - 260.
David Lefkowitz (2005). A Contractualist Defense of Democratic Authority. Ratio Juris 18 (3):346-364.
M. Joseph Sirgy (2002). Measuring Corporate Performance by Building on the Stakeholders Model of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):143 - 162.
Michael G. Pratt (2003). Promises and Perlocutions. In Matt Matravers (ed.), Scanlon and Contractualism. Frank Cass.
Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):137 - 148.
Philip Stratton-Lake (2003). Scanlon, Permissions, and Redundancy: Response to McNaughton and Rawling. Analysis 63 (4):332–337.
Added to index2012-07-26
Total downloads5 ( #170,343 of 738,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?