Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):209-224 (1996)
|Abstract||The 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act enacted a conceptual shift in the meaning of ‘disability.’ Rather than defining ‘disability’ as a disadvantageous physical or mental deficit of persons, it codifies the understanding of ‘disability’ as a defective state of society which disadvantages these persons. In contrast, the standard medical model incorrectly conceptualizes disabled persons as biologically inferior, and thus confines them to the role of recipients of benevolence or care. Turning to an ethic of caring yields counter-intuitive results that conflict with the conceptual apparatus of the ADA. It is argued that in order to liberate social thought from this medical model and thus move the disabled from being socially marginalized to being socially enabled, one must re-conceptualize current practice by adopting the ADA's conceptual framework. Keywords: caring, disability, equality, ethics, health care polic CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anita Silvers (1995). Reconciling Equality to Difference: Caring (F)or Justice for People with Disabilities. Hypatia 10 (1):30 - 55.
Susan Wendell (2001). Unhealthy Disabled: Treating Chronic Illnesses as Disabilities. Hypatia 16 (4):17-33.
Christopher L. Griffin Jr & Dov Fox, Disability-Selective Abortion and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Pamela Robert (2003). Disability Oppression in the Contemporary U. S. Capitalist Workplace. Science and Society 67 (2):136 - 159.
Dan W. Brock, Health Care Resource Prioritization and Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities.
Loretta M. Kopelman (1996). Ethical Assumptions and Ambiguities in the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):187-208.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads16 ( #74,686 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,722 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?