Patients' rights in England and the United States of America: The Patient's Charter and the New Jersey Patient Bill of Rights: a comparison
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):213-220 (1997)
The Patient's Charter has been in effect for nearly five years. This article considers the purpose and value of the document through a comparison with the New Jersey Patient Bill of Rights. Patient rights statements have been posted in American hospitals for more than twenty years. However, the New Jersey document and the patient rights programme it established seven years ago, have proven to be economically effective, successful in their representation of patients and enforceable, due to the adoption of state legislation and regulation to oversee the process. Several examples of how the programme works are included in the comparison, with a similar review of The Patient's Charter. In the comparison the author argues that for the programme to succeed as it has done in New Jersey, the government will need to develop legislative backing to ensure enforcement, and an efficient system for monitoring compliance. The programme will need to become credible in the eyes of the health service user. The author suggests this may be best achieved by developing an efficient, accessible and user-friendly means of redress, should the patient consider his or her rights have been violated. A "mish-mash" of quality assurance standards and levels of care which patients can "expect" from the health service providers only serves to distract the health service user from the government's failure to commit the resources that would empower the patients rights portion of The Patient's Charter
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Meyer (1992). Patients' Duties. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.
Tim Stoltzfus Jost (2010). Patient Rights in the United States: Beyond or Behind the Convention. In André den Exter (ed.), Human Rights and Biomedicine. Maklu
G. V. Saracoglu, B. Tokuc, F. Guler & H. Gul (2010). Evaluation of Patient Rights Practices in a Developing Country: The Edirne Model for the Implementation of Patient Rights in Turkey. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):488-493.
Garrett Albert Duncan (2000). Race and Human Rights Violations in the United States: Considerations for Human Rights and Moral Educators. Journal of Moral Education 29 (2):183-201.
Charlotte Williamson (2010). Towards the Emancipation of Patients: Patients' Experiences and the Patient Movement. Policy Press.
Mark Kuczewski (2012). Can Medical Repatriation Be Ethical? Establishing Best Practices. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):1-5.
Tolga Guven & Gurkan Sert (2010). Advance Directives in Turkey's Cultural Context: Examining the Potential Benefits for the Implementation of Patient Rights. Bioethics 24 (3):127-133.
David Gary Smith & Lisa H. Newton (1984). Physician and Patient: Respect for Mutuality. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Jay Katz (1984). The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Alfred I. Tauber (2003). Autonomy Gone Mad. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):75-80.
Gary B. Weiss (1984). Patient Truthfulness: A Test of Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):353-372.
Joan M. Teno, Charles Sabatino, Fenella Rouse & Joanne Lynn (1993). The Impact of the Patient Self-Determination Act's Requirement That States Describe Law Concerning Patients 'Rights'. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 21 (1):102-107.
Joseph L. Verheijde, Mohamed Y. Rady & Joan L. McGregor (2007). The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): New Challenges to Balancing Patient Rights and Physician Responsibilities. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2 (1):19.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads72 ( #60,963 of 1,911,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #319,111 of 1,911,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?