David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 190 (5):871-890 (2013)
Famously, Kripke has argued that the central portion of the Philosophical Investigations describes both a skeptical paradox and its skeptical solution. Solving the paradox involves the element of the community, which determines correctness conditions for rule-following behavior. What do such conditions precisely consist of? Is it accurate to say that there is no fact to the matter of rule following? How are the correctness conditions sustained in the community? My answers to these questions revolve around the idea (cf. P.I. §§198, 199) that a rule is followed insofar as a convention is in place. In particular, I consider the game-theoretic definition of convention offered by David Lewis and I show that it illuminates essential aspects of the communitarian understanding of rule-following. Make the following experiment: say “It’s cold here” and mean “It’s warm here”. Can you do it?Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 1953, §510.I can’t say “it’s cold here” and mean “it’s warm here”—at least, not without a little help from my friends.David Lewis, Convention
|Keywords||Coordination Rule-following Convention Wittgenstein David Lewis Common knowledge|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. McKenzie Alexander (2007). The Structural Evolution of Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Cristina Bicchieri (1988). Methodological Rules as Conventions. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (4):477-495.
K. G. Binmore (2005). Natural Justice. Oxford University Press.
Simon W. Blackburn (1984). The Individual Strikes Back. Synthese 58 (March):281-302.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Paul Piwek (2007). Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):403-421.
Robert Rooij & Tikitu Jager (2012). Explaining Quantity Implicatures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (4):461-477.
Neil Tennant (2001). Game Theory and Conventiont. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):3-19.
Don Ross (2012). Notes on Coordination, Game Theory and the Evolutionary Basis of Language. Interaction Studies 13 (1):50-65.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2009). On the Narrow Epistemology of Game Theoretic Agents. In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer.
Don Ross (2005). Distinctive Human Social Motivations in a Game-Theoretic Framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):715-716.
Margaret Gilbert (1981). Game Theory Andconvention. Synthese 46 (1):41 - 93.
Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2005). Science as a Persuasion Game: An Inferentialist Approach. Episteme 2 (3):189-201.
Isabelle Brocas (2011). Dynamic Inconsistency and Choice. Theory and Decision 71 (3):343-364.
Peter Vanderschraaf (1995). Convention as Correlated Equilibrium. Erkenntnis 42 (1):65 - 87.
Julia Tanney (2000). Playing the Rule-Following Game. Philosophy 75 (292):203-224.
Maarten C. W. Janssen (2003). Coordination and Cooperation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):165-166.
Allen L. Mann (2011). Independence-Friendly Logic: A Game-Theoretic Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Alessandro Torza (2013). How to Lewis a Kripke-Hintikka. Synthese 190 (4):743-779.
Giacomo Bonanno (1995). Review of Cristina Bicchieri's Rationality and Coordination. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 11 (2):359-366.
Added to index2012-12-04
Total downloads10 ( #141,181 of 1,096,609 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #71,259 of 1,096,609 )
How can I increase my downloads?