David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Public Health Ethics 4 (2):143-148 (2011)
Indoor smoking bans in public places is usually held as a simple and straightforward example of the application of the harm principle in public health. However, implementing indoor smoking bans in mental health centres is difficult because of the potential neurological and social benefits of smoking for persons with schizophrenia, as suggested by some empirical studies. In this article, the ethical challenges related to smoking bans in mental health centres as justified by the harm principle are explored. Particular attention is given to the case of R v. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust . The article concludes by arguing that the possible benefits of smoking for persons with schizophrenia creates a rightful interest that cannot be ignored even if one applies the harm principle to protect others from the negative effects of second-hand smoke. Applying the harm principle in the case of smoking bans in mental health centres requires protecting the interest of persons with schizophrenia to smoke via the value of reciprocity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Judy C. Nixon & Judy F. West (1989). The Ethics of Smoking Policies. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):409 - 414.
Martin J. Lecker (2009). The Smoking Penalty: Distributive Justice or Smokism? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):47 - 64.
David M. Ludington (1991). Smoking in Public: A Moral Imperative for the Most Toxic of Environmental Wastes. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (1):23 - 27.
E. Breton & W. Sherlaw (2011). Examining Tobacco Control Strategies and Aims Through a Social Justice Lens: An Application of Sen's Capability Approach. Public Health Ethics 4 (2):149-159.
Nils Holtug (2002). The Harm Principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
K. Voigt (2010). Smoking and Social Justice. Public Health Ethics 3 (2):91-106.
Walter E. Block (2010). Free to Smoke. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1/4):135-153.
Dennis R. Cooley (2005). Hospitality Industry Smoking Bans and Child Endangerment. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 24 (3):59-90.
S. Andrew Ostapski, L. Wayne Plumly & J. L. Love (1997). The Ethical and Economic Implications of Smoking in Enclosed Public Facilities: A Resolution of Conflicting Rights. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):377-384.
K. McMahon-Parkes (2011). Is Prevention Better Than Cure? A Re-Evaluation of the Potential Use of Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine in Children. Public Health Ethics 4 (2):121-128.
M. Lavin (1990). Let the Patients Smoke: A Defence of a Patient Privilege. Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):136-140.
Nils Holtug (2001). The Harm Principle and Genetically Modified Food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):168-178.
Nathan Nobis & Molly Gardner (2010). Cut the Fat! Defending Trans Fats Bans. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):39 - 40.
Added to index2011-07-06
Total downloads18 ( #96,851 of 1,099,722 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #21,060 of 1,099,722 )
How can I increase my downloads?