David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Heythrop Journal 54 (4):658-667 (2013)
Various authors within the contemporary debate on divine action in nature and contemporary science argue both for and against a Thomistic account of divine action through the notions of primary and secondary causes. In this paper I argue that those who support a Thomistic account of divine action often fail to explain Aquinas' doctrine in full, while those who argue against it base their objections on an incomplete knowledge of this doctrine, or identify it with Austin Farrer's doctrine of double agency – again failing to do Aquinas justice. I analyse these objections, indicating how they do not address Aquinas' doctrine by offering a brief but full account of the latter
|Keywords||Divine action Divine Providence Theology and science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ben Page (2015). The Dispositionalist Deity: How God Creates Laws and Why Theists Should Care. Zygon 50 (1):113-137.
Similar books and articles
John Lamont (1997). Aquinas on Divine Simplicity. The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
M. V. Dougherty (2002). Thomas Aquinas and Divine Command Theory. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:153-164.
W. Matthews Grant (2003). Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
Richard C. Taylor & Max Herrera (2005). Aquinas's Naturalized Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:85-102.
Richard Cross (1996). Aquinas on Nature, Hypostasis, and the Metaphysics of the Incarnation. The Thomist 60 (2):171 - 202.
Brian Davies (ed.) (2002). Thomas Aquinas: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
W. Matthews Grant (2001). Aquinas Among Libertarians and Compatibilists. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:221-235.
Eleonore Stump (2003). Aquinas. Routledge.
Bonnie Kent (2007). Aquinas and Weakness of Will. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):70–91.
Christina Van Dyke (2009). Not Properly a Person. Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):186-204.
John F. Wippel (2003). Norman Kretzmann on Aquinas's Attribution of Will and of Freedom to Create to God. Religious Studies 39 (3):287-298.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Mark D. Gossiaux (2003). Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
Added to index2011-09-02
Total downloads45 ( #97,903 of 1,934,581 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,826 of 1,934,581 )
How can I increase my downloads?