The Simulated Universe
Philosophy Now 75 (75):28-30 (2009)
| Abstract | This article explores the Simulated Universe argument with particular reference to Nick Bostrom’s formulation. After providing an exposition of the argument, I address two problems and conclude that we reject the possibility that we exist in a simulation. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
 Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWes Morriston (2000). Must the Beginning of the Universe Have a Personal Cause? Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):149-169.
Mark Colyvan, Jay L. Garfield & Graham Priest (2005). Problems with the Argument From Fine Tuning. Synthese 145 (3):325 - 338.
Alasdair M. Richmond (2008). Doomsday, Bishop Ussher and Simulated Worlds. Ratio 21 (2):201–217.
Stephen Grover (1998). Cosmological Fecundity. Inquiry 41 (3):277 – 299.
Gordon McCabe (2005). Universe Creation on a Computer. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (4):591-625.
David S. Oderberg (2003). The Beginning of Existence. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):145-157.
John Leslie (1989). Universes. Routledge.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads77 ( #10,404 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #4,642 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
